🔗 Share this article

The resistance may not be televised, though it may feature webbed feet and protruding eyes.

Furthermore, it may involve a unicorn's horn or the plumage of a chicken.

While demonstrations against the leadership carry on in US cities, demonstrators are adopting the energy of a neighborhood dress-up party. They've offered salsa lessons, given away snacks, and performed on unicycles, while officers watch.

Mixing levity and politics – a strategy social scientists term "tactical frivolity" – has historical precedent. Yet it has transformed into a defining feature of US demonstrations in the current era, adopted by both left and right.

One particular emblem has proven to be especially powerful – the frog. It began when a video of a confrontation between a protester in an inflatable frog and federal officers in the city of Portland, became an internet sensation. From there, it proliferated to demonstrations nationwide.

"There is much at play with that little blow-up amphibian," states a professor, a professor at UC Davis and an academic who studies political performance.

The Path From the Pepe Meme to Portland

It is difficult to examine demonstrations and amphibians without talking about Pepe, an illustrated figure co-opted by online communities throughout a previous presidential campaign.

Initially, when the meme initially spread on the internet, people used it to convey specific feelings. Subsequently, it was utilized to show support for a political figure, including one notable meme endorsed by the candidate himself, depicting the frog with recognizable attire and hairstyle.

The frog was also portrayed in digital spaces in offensive ways, as a hate group member. Users traded "rare Pepes" and set up cryptocurrency in his name. His catchphrase, "that feels good", became a coded signal.

However the character did not originate as a political symbol.

Its creator, the illustrator, has stated about his distaste for its appropriation. His creation was meant as simply a "chill frog-dude" in his comic world.

This character debuted in comic strips in 2005 – apolitical and notable for a quirky behavior. A film, which documents Mr Furie's efforts to take back of his creation, he explained the character came from his time with friends and roommates.

When he began, Mr Furie experimented with sharing his art to the nascent social web, where the community began to copy, alter, and reinterpret his character. As its popularity grew into darker parts of the internet, Mr Furie tried to disavow the frog, even killing him off in a comic strip.

Yet the frog persisted.

"This demonstrates the lack of control over symbols," states the professor. "They can change and shift and be repurposed."

Previously, the notoriety of this meme meant that amphibian imagery were predominantly linked to conservative politics. A transformation occurred in early October, when an incident between an activist wearing an inflatable frog costume and an immigration officer in Portland, Oregon captured global attention.

The event came just days after a decision to deploy the National Guard to Portland, which was called "war-ravaged". Demonstrators began to gather in droves outside a facility, just outside of a federal building.

Tensions were high and an agent sprayed irritant at a protester, directing it into the ventilation of the inflatable suit.

The protester, the man in the costume, quipped, remarking he had tasted "spicier tamales". However, the video spread everywhere.

The costume fit right in for Portland, known for its quirky culture and activist demonstrations that delight in the unusual – outdoor exercise, 80s-style aerobics lessons, and nude cycling groups. The city's unofficial motto is "Keep Portland Weird."

The frog was also referenced in subsequent court proceedings between the federal government and the city, which contended the use of troops was illegal.

Although the court ruled in October that the administration was within its rights to send personnel, one judge dissented, referencing in her ruling the protesters' "known tendency for donning inflatable costumes when expressing their disagreement."

"Observers may be tempted the majority's ruling, which accepts the description of Portland as a battlefield, as merely absurd," Judge Susan Graber opined. "However, this ruling goes beyond absurdity."

The action was stopped legally just a month later, and personnel have reportedly departed the area.

But by then, the amphibian costume had transformed into a significant anti-administration symbol for progressive movements.

The inflatable suit was seen nationwide at No Kings protests that fall. There were frogs – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in San Diego and Atlanta and Boston. They were in small towns and big international cities abroad.

The frog costume was in high demand on major websites, and saw its cost increase.

Mastering the Visual Story

The link between the two amphibian symbols – lies in the dynamic between the silly, innocent image and a deeper political meaning. Experts call this "tactical frivolity."

This approach relies on what the professor terms a "disarming display" – often silly, it acts as a "appealing and non-threatening" act that calls attention to a cause without explicitly stating them. It's the unusual prop used, or the symbol you share.

Mr Bogad is both an expert on this topic and someone who uses these tactics. He's written a book called 'Tactical Performance', and led seminars around the world.

"One can look back to historical periods – when people are dominated, they use absurdity to speak the truth a little bit and while maintaining a layer of protection."

The theory of such tactics is multi-faceted, he explains.

As activists confront the state, a silly costume {takes control of|seizes|influences